Strong correlation of Bush approval to national pre-elect and state exit polls

Strong correlation of Bush approval to national pre-elect and state exit polls

2004 State Recorded vote, Exit Poll and Bush Approval (11/17/05)

There was a strong 0.87 correlation between Bush monthly approval and his corresponding national pre-election poll average. Kerry led the final pre-election polls (after allocating undecideds) by 51-48%. Bush approval on election day was 48%.

There was also a strong 0.89 correlation between the state unadjusted exit polls and corresponding approval ratings one year after the election. Kerry won the aggregate unadjusted exit poll by 52-47%.

Key points:
1- Best-fit linear regressions show that WPE (the average state exit poll discrepancy) decreased going from strong Kerry to Bush states. The strategy was simple: Bush padded his popular vote in strong Kerry states (CA,NY etc); the electoral vote was padded in the battleground states.

2- Bush statewide poll and vote shares were strongly correlated to approval one year AFTER the election. There is a strong relationship between approval and election polls.

3- Bush exit poll shares were negatively correlated to WPE. The exit poll vote discrepancies were weighted heavily in favor of Bush.

It’s just graphically stating the obvious:
Approval ratings are a powerful indicator of the TRUE VOTE…

National Exit Poll

via Progressive Independent – Viewing topic.

Post to Twitter

Share

Filed Under: Crime, Legal Issues

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Thom’s Blog
    Thom plus logo
     Who will you vote for this year: Big Oil, Big Casinos, or Wall Street?

     
    Billionaire hedge fund manager - and primary contributor to Rick Santorum's Red, White, and Blue SuperPAC - Foster Friess let the truth slip out about politics in this post-Citizens United age during an interview with Politico. Friess was among several billionaires who attended the Koch brothers secret meeting last month where over a hundred million dollars was pledged to beat President Obama.
    Trying to get other oligarchs on the side of Rick Santorum - Friess said, "There isn't a person at the Koch brothers events who would not get a good return on their investment by investing in [Santorum] as president, because of what they believe about the free enterprise system." The key word there: investment. These aren't campaign contributions - these are investments that millionaires and billionaires are making to keep their tax breaks, their subsidies, and their lax regulations in place.
    We no longer have actual people running for President - we have a few very, very rich people like Friess and the Kochs investing in stooges to do their bidding - and hoping to see major returns in their bank accounts. So who will you vote for this year? Big Oil, Big Casinos, or Wall Street?
    -Thom
    (Who will you vote for this year? Tell us here.)

  • LEGALIZE Democracy

    " We the corporations" On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. __________

    MOVE to AMEND

    a project of the CAMPAIGN TO LEGALIZE Democracy

    Help end Corporate personhood