Mayhill Fowler: Some Straight Talk on Afghanistan

afghanistanThis is not an 18-month commitment.

“I was really depressed when I learned he [Obama] was going to say it’s all about al Qaeda,” Marvin Weinbaum said. Weinbaum is a scholar-in-residence at the Middle East Institute and an Afghanistan expert who visited the White House during the months President Obama was crafting his new AfPak policy. Now he is working with the Afghan Familiarization Program to help prepare the civilians who are going in country, the “expeditionary forces” who will implement a significant part of the president’s new policy. On Friday he spoke to a group of journalists at the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism at the University of Maryland. (Watch the speech and the Q & A here.)

“But for political expediency reasons — and I understand, that’s what grabs the American people,” Weinbaum continued, going on to explain why al Qaeda is not the reason we are still in Afghanistan. Although I think Marvin Weinbaum is wrong on the subject of what grabs us Americans (I do not believe that the threat of al Qaeda is any longer one of those attention-grabbers), Weinbaum does know Afghanistan. “I’m one of the few people left who took any interest in Afghanistan in the 1960s and 1970s,” Weinbaum said. His discourse at the Knight Center is telling in many ways. Since the session is an hour-and-a-half long, I annotate the highlights below.

55:37 This is not an 18-month commitment. “I was in the White House last week. I’ll give you first-hand what their thinking is — it’s an indefinite commitment. . . . At 18 months we’re going to be evaluating whether our strategy is working. . . . We’re not saying forever…. We might go from 100,000 to 98,000 [troops] if we are succeeding.”

Full Story Mayhill Fowler: Some Straight Talk on Afghanistan.

Post to Twitter

Share

Filed Under: Foreign Policy

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Thom’s Blog
    Thom plus logo
      The oligarchs openly talking about a coup d'état in America?
     

    Multi-millionaire lobbyist Grover Norquist is calling for the impeachment of President Obama. In an interview with the right-wing National Journal - Norquist warned that if President Obama wins re-election and decides to let the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% expire at the end of the year - then Republicans will "have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach [him]."
     
    What does that mean? It means that the super rich in America - and their political operatives like Norquist in Washington, DC - have now compared a tiny tax increase on the wealthy to high crimes and treason - the only Constitutional basis Congress can use to impeach a President. It sounds like the oligarchs are now openly talking about a coup d'état in America.
     
    -Thom
     
    (Do you think will try it? Tell us here.)
  • LEGALIZE Democracy

    " We the corporations" On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. __________

    MOVE to AMEND

    a project of the CAMPAIGN TO LEGALIZE Democracy

    Help end Corporate personhood