To Progressives: What Now?

question, ?

We lost this one. Unless the Senate uses reconciliation to strengthen the current Senate version of the HCR bill, the bill will pass with an individual mandate but no public option. All progressives will agree this constitutes a betrayal of the initial contract that won progressives’ support for an insurance industry-based plan. Those who argued for a stronger starting negotiating position have been vindicated and can tell those who didn’t “I told you so.”

Now that we’ve got that behind us, let’s focus on a constructive answer to, “What now?” I see two options: work to kill the Senate healthcare bill and work to move the center of the Senate majority left, or just work to move the Senate majority left.

To get no healthcare bill at all is the gift most wanted by the Republicans, and is more damaging to our interests than even this travesty Obama and Reid have managed. So killing the bill outright is a non-starter for me.

I personally have yet to see a way to kill the Senate healthcare bill and replace it with something that doesn’t violate the mandate-for-a-public-option contract at this late date, but if someone more imaginative than me can figure it out, I’m all ears.

Obama has shown he’s not real interested what’s in the bill as long as something called a healthcare bill passes. He and Rahm seem to have concluded they don’t need to heed the cry of their base, so I’m at a loss as to how we get through to them in time for this legislation.

Reid has shown he’s not going to risk defeat of the legislation over the public option if Obama doesn’t care, so all these dreams of getting it through leadership threats of reconciliation are just fantasies.

Full Story The Seminal » To Progressives: What Now?.

Post to Twitter

Share

Filed Under: Politics

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Thom’s Blog
    Thom plus logo
      The oligarchs openly talking about a coup d'état in America?
     

    Multi-millionaire lobbyist Grover Norquist is calling for the impeachment of President Obama. In an interview with the right-wing National Journal - Norquist warned that if President Obama wins re-election and decides to let the Bush tax cuts for the top 2% expire at the end of the year - then Republicans will "have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach [him]."
     
    What does that mean? It means that the super rich in America - and their political operatives like Norquist in Washington, DC - have now compared a tiny tax increase on the wealthy to high crimes and treason - the only Constitutional basis Congress can use to impeach a President. It sounds like the oligarchs are now openly talking about a coup d'état in America.
     
    -Thom
     
    (Do you think will try it? Tell us here.)
  • LEGALIZE Democracy

    " We the corporations" On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. __________

    MOVE to AMEND

    a project of the CAMPAIGN TO LEGALIZE Democracy

    Help end Corporate personhood