Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth calls for independent investigation

The buildings didn't implode. They exploded!

Momentum is growing in what’s come to be called the “911 Truth Movement.” Apparently the psychological shock of what happened that September 11th was sufficient to delay many of us from even getting around to looking at the evidence. Of course we had to wait almost three years for the government’s official pronouncement: The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, or more simply, The 911 Commission’s Report.

When I saw those building fall on TV that day, I told someone it looked like a planned demolition. My friend agreed. That wasn’t the correct terminology, but we got the concept. It wasn’t until I saw the government’s treatment of evidence in its report that I was completely converted however. Like in the JFK assassination, evidence that contradicted the predetermined conclusion was destroyed, buried in endless pages of trivia, or simply ignored. That’s not how investigations are supposed to work. The evidence is supposed to guide the conclusion, not the other way round.

I’ll be following developments in a growing movement by a group called Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, whose founder, Richard Gage, heard a discussion on Bonnie Faulkner’s KPFA show “Guns and Butter,” which led to his forming this group.

The helpful aspect of this group is that it’s harder to pass these people off as conspiracy wack jobs. They speak the language of scientists and are cultivated skeptics. It’s true that just because a scientist says something doesn’t necessarily mean what’s said is scientific, but that applies as fairly to the “government scientists.”

Full Story Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth calls for independent investigation.