Palin’s Politics of Personal Responsibility in Tatters; Daughter Willow Avoids Criminal Charges

New information coming out about Willow Palin today may make it impossible for Serial Quitter and Fox News Personality Sarah Palin to preach the politics of “personal responsibility” ever again. Expect this to break wide today, maybe even in the lamestream media, as Palin herself might call it. If the National Enquirer doesn’t get the Pulitzer Prize with its outing of the John Edwards affair — in which the tabloid scooped the whole wide world — maybe their reporting back in January on Willow Palin’s trouble with the cops might do it.

The roots of this story go back to The Palins’ vacation in the sunny climes of Hawaii. Remember that one? The media had it that The Palins fled the island after she was caught blacking out John McCain’s name on a visor. Until today, we all bought that story, which appears to have played into Palin’s hands because she needed us to buy that story. It now appears to have just been a convenient coincidence. Maybe her father didn’t get the word in time, because he also tried to provide cover for the family with an even stranger cover story, which alluded to racism on Palin's part.

Now as we learn on The Immoral Minority web site, the retreat from Hawaii might have nothing to do with the visor whatsoever. The timing is suspicious because that’s also around the time when State Troopers in Alaska were giving Willow Palin and her pals the third degree in Wasilla.

Full Story: News Hounds: Palin’s Politics of Personal Responsibility in Tatters; Daughter Willow Avoids Criminal Charges.

Post to Twitter

Share

Filed Under: Rightwing World

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Thom’s Blog
    Thom plus logo
     Who will you vote for this year: Big Oil, Big Casinos, or Wall Street?

     
    Billionaire hedge fund manager - and primary contributor to Rick Santorum's Red, White, and Blue SuperPAC - Foster Friess let the truth slip out about politics in this post-Citizens United age during an interview with Politico. Friess was among several billionaires who attended the Koch brothers secret meeting last month where over a hundred million dollars was pledged to beat President Obama.
    Trying to get other oligarchs on the side of Rick Santorum - Friess said, "There isn't a person at the Koch brothers events who would not get a good return on their investment by investing in [Santorum] as president, because of what they believe about the free enterprise system." The key word there: investment. These aren't campaign contributions - these are investments that millionaires and billionaires are making to keep their tax breaks, their subsidies, and their lax regulations in place.
    We no longer have actual people running for President - we have a few very, very rich people like Friess and the Kochs investing in stooges to do their bidding - and hoping to see major returns in their bank accounts. So who will you vote for this year? Big Oil, Big Casinos, or Wall Street?
    -Thom
    (Who will you vote for this year? Tell us here.)

  • LEGALIZE Democracy

    " We the corporations" On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. __________

    MOVE to AMEND

    a project of the CAMPAIGN TO LEGALIZE Democracy

    Help end Corporate personhood